The blurbs on the jacket of the 25th anniversary edition of The
Princess Bride belie the widely held belief that endorsements tell
you little about a book besides the names of its author's drinking
pals. Never have two statements of approval been more in conflict:
The Los Angeles Times describes William Goldman's timeless adventure
story as "one of the funniest, most original, and deeply moving
novels I have read in a long time." Newsweek, on the other
hand, calls it "a 'classic' medieval melodrama that sounds
like all the Saturday serials you ever saw feverishly reworked by
the Marx Brothers." Can a story be loved for being both "original"
and "like all the Saturday serials you ever saw"? How
is it possible for a work of art to attract such startlingly contradictory
compliments?
Shotgun Players' latest production might help make
sense of this paradox, for playwright-director Mark Jackson's The
Forest War weaves a tale that's as old as the trees and still somehow
feels like a spring sapling. Set in the ancient Asiatic fiefdom
of the Grand Lord Karug following his successful military campaign
against the enemy Vohakta tribe to wrestle ownership of the Great
Forest (an important source of fuel and lumber), Jackson's consuming,
epic narrative of war, governance, and love sets two opposing worldviews
against one another: The community-minded nobleman Lord Kulan wishes
to promote peace and rebuild his battle-scarred country, while Lord
Kain, the son of Karug, is all for continuing the fight until every
single Vohak is dead. By unexpectedly abdicating his throne to Kulan
instead of his own progeny, the elderly Karug hopes to help his
war-torn nation find firm footing once again. But illicit passions,
covert strategies, and betrayal conspire almost immediately to undermine
the fragile harmony.
Sound familiar? We've seen The Forest War a thousand
times before in other guises. My familiarity sensors were working
overtime as I sat watching the play the other night. The grand sweep
of the narrative, with its struggling factions, brings everything
from the Iliad and the Mahabharata to Star Wars and The Lord of
the Rings to mind. Even the characters' names sound like life forms
you'd encounter on Tatooine or Endor. It's as if Shakespeare were
performing Jedi mind tricks on Jackson's writing. Aspects of the
characters' personalities and actions bring counterparts from the
Bard's dramas — particularly the "Henriad" history
plays — to mind. There's a little of Prince Hal in Kulan,
Richard II in Karug, and Hotspur in Kaine. The Forest War's mixture
of high- and low-caste types also echoes the Henriad's blending
of kings and commoners. Even the opening statement — "With
this new sun, we greet a long awaited peace" — echoes
the first line of King Richard III ("Now is the winter of our
discontent/ Made glorious summer by this sun of York") both
in imagery and sentiment. Famous tropes from Greek tragedy similarly
find their way into Jackson's narrative. Sympathetic characters
are marred with "fatal flaws," and the play's final act
of vengeance is preceded by the presentation of a "treacherous
gift" à la Medea.
The themes in The Forest War are so universal that
they're ingrained in our subconscious. Part of the play's strength
lies in its ability to activate our powers of recognition, though
Jackson occasionally goes too far with familiarity. The parallels
between American political history and The Forest War's story of
an essentially virtuous leader whose dalliance with a subordinate
leads to a regime change and a crusade (helmed by the bloodthirsty
son of a former ruler) to gain control over natural resources need
not be spelled out. And yet it's virtually impossible to sit through
Jackson's production without seeing visions of the Bushes, the Clintons,
the so-called "War on Terror," and even Monica Lewinsky
dancing before our eyes. Which brings me to the second half of our
inquiry: To engage us, a familiar story has to be well told. We
should feel like we're hearing it for the first time. The only reason
Jackson gets away with his heavy-handed allegory is because he's
such a compelling storyteller.
Jackson drives his epic plot along with prose that's
as muscular as it is bewitching. Swaggering political speeches melt
into lines of lyrical sweetness. The phrase "hold still, Time,
while I catch you with my brushes. And one day, we may learn from
this memory of you held captive by color wrapped in lines"
seems to hang in the air like breath on a winter's day. At other
times, Jackson conveys ideas so compactly that they reverberate
long after War's conclusion. "Peace is just a moment's pause
for aim" has been scored in my thoughts ever since. The characters,
though largely symbolic, are sharply drawn. Kain (a praying mantislike
Kevin Clarke) leaps off the stage with his venomous plans. Meanwhile,
Kulan's battle with his conscience (sympathetically portrayed by
Cassidy Brown) makes the hero seem deeply human. Even secondary
characters like the moral-dispensing cloth-maker Madam Ajbi and
the gossiping doctor Madam Ajtza come to life thanks to Jackson's
use of comical catchphrases.
If anything keeps us hypnotized for close to three
hours, it's the production's gliding visual and musical landscapes
— created with perfect control and attack by the acting ensemble
and two musicians. Whether consciously or not, the production echoes
certain Western theatrical auteurs' interpretations of Eastern dramatic
traditions. Jackson seems a natural heir to the celebrated French
director Ariane Mnouchkine in particular. Mnouchkine terms her work
"imaginary kabuki" because she's not interested in the
authentic regurgitation of Asian theatrical forms; she'd rather
reinvent them to create a new sense of reality. Jackson does the
same in The Forest War. By blending characteristics of kabuki —
such as heavily stylized movements, elaborate makeup and costumes,
black-clad stage "assistants" (or "kurogo"),
and simple props instead of full-fledged scenery (e.g., a small
black-and-gold mat to symbolize the throne) — with occidental
ideas (such as fierce, mood-shifting lighting effects and Western
musical instruments like the clarinet and timpani), Jackson creates
a physical environment that flawlessly encapsulates his theme: the
simultaneous dissonance and harmony between two very different ways
of being.
When myth expert Joseph Campbell wrote "the latest
incarnation of Oedipus, the continued romance of Beauty and The
Beast, stands this afternoon on the corner of 42nd Street and Fifth
Avenue, waiting for the traffic light to change," he meant
that we are all still creatures of myth. Yet the quirkiness of this
image makes the ancient legends seem postmodern. Just as the principles
of yin and yang, war and peace, and life and death are inextricably
linked in The Forest War, so a great story is old and new at once.
|
 |
|