The Typographer's Dream" explores the working lives
of a typographer, a geographer, and a stenographer in the form of
a panel discussion at a conference, during which the panelists talk
about how their occupations work and why they matter. This may sound
like a boring premise, but "The Typographer's Dream" brilliantly
manages to defy the misconception that great theater can only draw
from extraordinary experiences, and elevates the nine-to-five lives
of three everyday heroes into an excitingly original and thought-provoking
human comedy.
Tellingly, the houselights are not dimmed during the performance,
and the neurotic preoccupations of the panelists implicate the spectators
as well. This cheekily suggests that every one of us could find
ourselves lodged behind a conference table, sipping filtered water,
and revealing that the grand dramas and passions of our lives are
the same details that preoccupy millions of other working stiffs.
Playwright Adam Bock's play is well-staged and convincingly acted,
but it's the play's uniqueness that makes it truly special. Sure,
there are the familiar themes of love, self-realization, substance
abuse and so forth, but how many plays really include lengthy monologues
about designing typesets for the letter "A"?
And never was a panel more idiosyncratically entertaining. The
typographer, endearingly played by Aimee Guillot, is a bashful,
bike-riding, bandana-sporting idealist who obsesses over revealing
textual truths through font sizes. More often than not, her efforts
to express how exactly she feels about sans serif script are interrupted
by the geographer, portrayed by the hillarious Jamie Jones, who
indulges in a nearly physical love affair with maps. Michael Shipley's
sheepishly enigmatic stenographer is proud to go by the more glamorous
job title of court reporter, and still revels in the fact that he
became a high school celebrity for his ambidextrous, rhythmical
typing skills.
At first, "The Typographer's Dream" seems to echo every
recent college graduate's worst nightmare: The characters are defined
not by who they are, but by what they do. They are their jobs. But
halfway through the play the mood shifts, the characters' body language
relaxes, and we are suddenly allowed short glimpses into their private
lives. The typographer, the geographer, and the stenographer become
Margaret, Annalise, and Dave. Unfortunately, although this implies
that there is a life beyond the desk, this life offers little relaxation
from the deterministic implications of the characters' career choices,
and they struggle to define their non-professional identities.
The play is as tightly scripted as an episode of "Arrested
Development," and it is ceaselessly fascinating to see how
many revelatory interrelations exist between the three occupations
and the individuals who represent them. At times, the play's language
veers a bit too far into the realm of corny poetics, but generally
its unwavering attention to minute details highlights the fact that
even the most repetitive daily acts contain beauty if we look hard
enough.
|
|
|